Neither one is better
The title of this post asks which is better. The honest answer is that neither is, and a page cannot tell you which suits you — that is what an assessment is for.
What follows is how the two differ, so the conversation at your consultation makes more sense.
The difference in method
| SQT bio microneedling | Standard microneedling | |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery | Sponge spicules applied to the skin | Fine needles in a device |
| Machine | No | Yes |
| Numbing | Generally not used | Often used |
| Sensation | Prickling or tingling | Varies; discussed beforehand |
| Recovery | Light flaking common | Redness common, settling over a day or two |
Which one gets recommended
That depends on your skin, your history, what you have had done before, how your skin has reacted to previous treatments, and what you are trying to change.
Skin sensitivity, barrier condition and your skin tone are all part of that assessment. So is what you can realistically accommodate afterwards.
Sometimes the answer is neither — because something else is a better fit, or because your skin needs to settle first. See what we will and will not treat.
Questions people ask
Which one has the easier recovery?
They differ, and what you experience depends on your skin. We tell you what to expect for the treatment we recommend before you book it.
Is one gentler?
The methods differ. Whether a given method is gentler for you is an assessment question.
How many sessions will I need?
Decided after we have seen your skin, not before.
Can I have one if I have had the other?
Possibly. Bring it up at your consultation, including timings.
Related
Treatment experiences and outcomes vary. The most suitable microneedling approach depends on your skin concerns, skin condition and individual assessment. A consultation is recommended before treatment.